Knowledge and testing
Reproducibility
Reproduserbarheit
Extended note
In historical and institutional matters the requirement often concerns reconstruction of the analysis, not repetition of the event.
Limitations
Not the same as
- repeatability
- identical conclusion in every case
- repetition of the past
Related terms
Methodological relevance
Audit record, source provenance, analytical choices, and revision trail must enable review.
Sources and principal occurrence
Source note: R1 — Methodology of Reality Audit.
- R1 — Methodology of Reality AuditThe published methodological justification of Reality Audit.
- Reality Audit — methodology overviewThe common methodological architecture.
Correct and incorrect use
Correct use
“Another auditor can reconstruct the analysis from the case record.”
Incorrect or over-strong use
“The event cannot be repeated, so the audit cannot be reviewed.”
Suggested citation
Suggested citationVikesland, M. A. A. (2026). “Reproducibility”. Røyndalism — Lexicon, content version 1.0.
APAVikesland, M. A. A. (2026). Reproducibility (version 1.0). Røyndalism. https://royndalisme.no/en/lexicon/reproducibility/
MLAVikesland, Martin A. A.. “Reproducibility.” Røyndalism, version 1.0, Vikesland Press, 2026, https://royndalisme.no/en/lexicon/reproducibility/.
ChicagoVikesland, Martin A. A.. “Reproducibility.” Røyndalism. version 1.0. Vikesland Press, 2026. https://royndalisme.no/en/lexicon/reproducibility/.
IEEEM. A. A. Vikesland, “Reproducibility,” Røyndalism, version 1.0, Vikesland Press, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://royndalisme.no/en/lexicon/reproducibility/
CSEVikesland MAA. 2026. Reproducibility. version 1.0. Røyndalism. Vikesland Press. Available from: https://royndalisme.no/en/lexicon/reproducibility/
Check institutional requirements for access date, line breaks, and minor differences among style manuals.
Revision note
- Document version
- 1.0
- First published
- 18 June 2026
First public edition.