Relational reference system
Map
The map shows how the foundational work, framework, theory, method, findings, correction, applications, documents, and reference systems relate. It is not a linear developmental sequence and does not establish ontological truth by placement alone.
Function and limit
The map is a navigation and orientation instrument. It makes relations, statuses, and document branches visible, but does not replace definitions, arguments, audit, or testing against what is.
Relational map
Begin with the principal branches and open only the part you want to examine. Search and filters open relevant branches automatically. Relations are stated at the branches and in the detail panel, not across intersecting lines.
54 matching elements
is developed through Theory Theory
is operationalised through R0 Reality Audit Method
The first integrated R0–R7 architecture for methodology, standard, procedure, findings, capture risk, correction, audit types, applications, cases, and resources.
Open page: Reality AuditMethod programme R0–R7 The completed first R0–R7 architecture from methodological justification and standard to findings, correction, cases, and resources.
examines through Audit Types Method
is applied to Applications Application
is documented through C0 Cases and Documentation Case and register
is terminologically defined in / is described as a publication in Reference and publication information Introduction, terminology, relational map, and published institutional information.
No elements match the filter.
Relation types
Relations are verbs, not equality signs. They state the kind of connection made visible by the map.
- grounds
- The foundational work supplies the expressed framework's primary ground, without making the framework identical with the work or with actuality.
- is introduced through
- An introduction gives the reader a bounded entry to purpose, structure, and reading order.
- is philosophically articulated as
- The framework is philosophically placed and argued through an explicit position.
- is developed through
- An overall framework is substantively developed through distinct theoretical areas and documents.
- is operationalised through
- Principles are made testable through a bounded method, procedure, and documentation.
- is terminologically defined in
- Terminological use is gathered and bounded in the canonical lexicon.
- is relationally mapped in
- Structural and documentary relations are made visible in the map.
- is described as a publication in
- Publication ground, citation, correction, languages, and contact are separated as publication information.
- organises
- An overview gathers subordinate documents or programme elements without making them mutually identical.
- examines through
- The method uses a specialised audit type for a bounded object and question.
- may identify
- An audit may, when the threshold is met, support a bounded finding; the result is not built in beforehand.
- may require
- A sufficiently documented finding may ground proportionate correction and subsequent effect review.
- is applied to
- The method is adapted to a domain under relevant professional, legal, and institutional limits.
- is documented through
- The work is made traceable through a work journal, example, protocol, case, or register.
Accessible textual structure
The textual structure contains the same mapped elements in a linear expandable list. It works without JavaScript and supplements the mind map at every screen size.
Foundation and principal structureThe foundational work, framework, philosophical position, and operative method.
-
The authorised foundational work and primary source for actuality, knowledge, language, the human being, system, and practice.
-
The overall framework developed from the foundational work, keeping its own representations open to testing and correction.
-
The current philosophical and academic placement of the framework.
-
The published theory programme comprising Corrigible Realism and T1–T9.
-
The first integrated R0–R7 architecture for methodology, standard, procedure, findings, capture risk, correction, audit types, applications, cases, and resources.
Theory programme T1–T9Nine theoretical areas in working and publication order, without claiming that actuality itself is linear.
-
Theoretical document or programme element.
-
Theoretical document or programme element.
-
Theoretical document or programme element.
-
Theoretical document or programme element.
-
Theoretical document or programme element.
-
Distinguishes the human being, self, identity, role, status, and action, and bounds identity capture.
-
Distinguishes system, organisation, institution, mandate, competence, power, authority, legitimacy, and responsibility, and bounds system and authority capture.
-
Distinguishes fact, value, norm, law, decision, action, and effect, and develops responsible practice and the foundational shift.
-
Collapse conditions, self-examination, open questions, and comparative academic placement.
Method programme R0–R7The completed first R0–R7 architecture from methodological justification and standard to findings, correction, cases, and resources.
- R1 Methodology
The published methodological justification of epistemic status, validity, traceability, counter-testing, competence, and corrigibility.
-
Methodological document or programme element.
- R3 Procedure
Methodological document or programme element.
-
The published R1 section on material, source, provenance, records, and reviewable documentation.
- R4 Findings
Classification of correspondence, uncertainty, error, or capture risk.
- R6 Correction
Proportionate response and subsequent effect review.
- R5 Capture Risk
Classification of correspondence, uncertainty, error, or capture risk.
-
Methodological document or programme element.
-
Application domain with field-specific requirements and limits.
-
Working or documentation resource.
-
Example, protocol, case, or register infrastructure.
-
Working or documentation resource.
Audit types A1–A7Seven specialised audit types with a common standard and bounded competence.
-
Specialised audit type under the common standard.
-
Specialised audit type under the common standard.
- A3 Model Audit
Specialised audit type under the common standard.
-
Specialised audit type under the common standard.
-
Specialised audit type under the common standard.
-
Specialised audit type under the common standard.
-
Specialised audit type under the common standard.
Applications D1–D8Domains in which the method is adapted without replacing professional, legal, or institutional competence.
-
Application domain with field-specific requirements and limits.
-
Application domain with field-specific requirements and limits.
-
Application domain with field-specific requirements and limits.
-
Application domain with field-specific requirements and limits.
-
Application domain with field-specific requirements and limits.
-
Application domain with field-specific requirements and limits.
-
Application domain with field-specific requirements and limits.
-
Application domain with field-specific requirements and limits.
-
Cross-cutting operational guidance on mandates, competence, impartiality, decision power, publication, and chains of responsibility.
Examples, protocols, and registersSynthetic examples, protocols, and register infrastructure for traceable public documentation.
-
Example, protocol, case, or register infrastructure.
-
Example, protocol, case, or register infrastructure.
-
Example, protocol, case, or register infrastructure.
-
Example, protocol, case, or register infrastructure.
-
Example, protocol, case, or register infrastructure.
-
Example, protocol, case, or register infrastructure.
-
Example, protocol, case, or register infrastructure.
-
Example, protocol, case, or register infrastructure.
Reference and publication informationIntroduction, terminology, relational map, and published institutional information.
-
The academic entry to purpose, ground, limits, and reading order.
-
The canonical terminological reference system with definitions, limits, and cross-references.
- Map You are here
This relational navigation and status overview.
-
The published institutional overview of responsibility, foundation, citation, corrections, languages, and contact.
Revision history
- Document version
- 1.0
- First published
- 18 June 2026
First public edition.